Sarah Flannery of MCAHS2 writes to the F.T.

Here is the text of Sarah’s letter to the Financial Times…..

The failure of HS2 is the project that should make our entire Government reach for the Kleenex

HS2 was due to open next year, having cost £37.5 billion. The fact that not a centimetre of track has yet been laid and that the budget and construction dates are currently incalculable comes as no surprise to a jaded and sceptical electorate.  

Mark Wild, HS2 Ltd CEO, reckons that the bottom line is that £26bn is already spent “and we’re just over halfway done … Between 50% and 100% is the likely overspend.”

Back in October 2023, when Rishi Sunak announced the cancellation of HS2, it seemed as though the flawed project had finally been cauterised. But HS2 was always covered with Teflon and because it was only partially cancelled, Phase 1 – the bit between Wormwood Scrubs and Birmingham – is still siphoning taxpayers’ money while its construction limps along. Now, however, the sunk cost is hidden between the government’s careful presentation of largesse to defence, the NHS and public investment. In the spending review, HS2 merited a notional reference about an allocation of £25.3bn ‘to address longstanding delivery challenges’ for HS2. Do let that sink in: almost a quarter of the government’s ENTIRE investment budget of £113bn barely warrants a mention. HS2 is so tainted that Chancellor Rachel Reeves could neither brag about nor justify this gargantuan waste of public money.

If Heidi Alexander, the Transport Secretary, really believes that it is only going to be a matter of months before she can confirm an updated schedule for completion or even costs for the project, she is as deluded as every other transport secretary who has taken on the poisoned chalice of this project. Philip Hammond, Justine Greening, Patrick McLoughlin, Chris Grayling, Grant Shapps, Anne-Marie Trevelyan, Mark Harper and Louise Haigh join Ms Alexander in the roll call of Transport Secretaries who have been responsible for HS2 since its launch. If we are looking to appoint blame, let’s start with them. Feel free to add the various HS2 executives who have been amongst the highest paid public servants in UK.

Mercifully we are now long past the hubris and hype of boasting about  ‘Europe’s biggest rail project’. Instead, we are trying to bury this dysfunctional national embarrassment. It is the perfect metaphor for all that is wrong with UK PLC: farcical plans, scattergun objectives, open chequebooks, revolving doors, incompetence, inept management. tainted partnerships and, probably, outright fraud.

Spare voters the usual rhetoric about ‘getting a grip’ and ‘learning lessons’ because, frankly, it falls on hollow ears. And don’t try to pin this shambles onto protesters and NIMBYs. The blame for this catastrophe certainly doesn’t lie with those who campaigned against the project. Groups such as ours (Mid Cheshire against HS2) worked tirelessly – and unpaid – to inform policy maker muppets of the folly of trying to build an ultra-high speed railway on this a small island with challenging geology, with faster and more frequent trains than anywhere else in the world. Anything is possible, but only if money is no object. And that’s never the case, even though HS2 comes close.

HS2 is an indictment of the country’s current approach to major infrastructure projects. It represents a monumental failure to articulate a problem (capacity, local infrastructure and better Northern connectivity) and conflate it with speed, vanity, and London-centric links.

Reeves and Starmer bottled it. They could have scrapped the entire thing and switched focus to repurposing the enabling works done thus far in favour of recouping costs for the taxpayer. Now is the time to sell HS2 land. Sell or make available the 27% of the HS2 property portfolio that lies empty. Drop the safeguarding. Come clean about the true costs, accept that billions have been blown and concentrate on not blowing a penny more by putting the money to better use on other, viable infrastructure. Overhaul the relationship between the Department for Transport, HS2 Ltd, procurement systems and contractor relationships. For good measure, spare us any iteration along the lines of HS2 Lite or NPR by any means.

All we want is to be shown that ‘lessons have been learned’. Draw a line in the sand and cancel HS2 completely right now. Don’t say we didn’t tell you it would all work out like this.  – call it schadenfreude.

Yours,

Sarah Flannery

Mid Cheshire Against HS2

Listen to a BBC Interview on the dreadful impact on farmers and others of HS2 Safeguarding

The piece was broadcast in the early morning of Tuesday 7th January 2025 and will only be available for 29 days from then.

So make sure you listen while you have the chance.

The segment on HS2 is from six minutes into the 15 minute programme, so you can skip forward if you don’t want to listen to ‘innovative food and farming ideas’

This is the link to the BBC website https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0026nl8

What a Way to Go !

Cheshire East Borough Council in exercise of its powers under Section 14 (2) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 and of all other enabling powers issues this notice temporarily to prohibit traffic in the following length of road:- Congleton Road, Gawsworth Ward, Gawsworth, SK11 9EW from Gawsworth Methodist Church to the junction of Forge Close.

The alternative route will be via the following streets: –

Congleton Road,

Park Lane,

Park Lane Roundabout,

Park Street,

Mill Lane,

Hibel Road,

Churchill Way Roundabout,

Churchill Way,

King Edward Street,

Chester Road,

Cumberland Street Roundabout,

Ivy Road Roundabout,

Broken Cross,

Broken Cross Roundabout,

Chelford Road,

Church Lane,

Manchester Road,

Wolstenholme Elmy Way,

Macclesfield Road,

School Lane

 

Yes – it’s true!!!

What Private Eye thinks about the HS2 Oversight Committee

From Private Eye……

FEARS GROW OVER HS2 OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE

by our correspondent Brad Money-Pitt

There were growing concerns today that the HS2 oversight committee set up by new Transport Secretary  Louise Haigh to ensure that the latest stage of HS2 delivers value for money for taxpayers could report late and go wildly over budget.

Insiders warn that the committee, which had been budgeted at £8m and scheduled to deliver its report in March 2025, and is headed by James Stewart, former Chair of Infrastructure at KMPG, may now cost as much as £4bn and not report until 2029 at the earliest.

Said one insider, “ The project is beset by internal wranglings and unforeseen cost overruns, such as securing expensive HS2 office space in Euston which costs a fortune apparently”.

The Tories have called on the Labour government to scrap the HS2 oversight committee, branding it an expensive white elephant, but Labour said they would be putting an HS2 oversight oversight committee in place to ensure that the HS2 oversight committee provides the taxpayers with value for money.

WE WON! – HS2 CANCELLED

Yes, residents of Mid-Cheshire no longer have the threat of HS2 being driven through our quiet villages with all the threatened work camps, depots and marshalling yards spreading like a virus over the county for years on end during construction, not to mention countless lorries on the few roads that haven’t been closed.

It all seems so long ago (actually 10 years!) that we realised the HS2 project was not just a vague (wiggly) pencil line on an O/S map (more likely a fag packet) but a monstrous, concrete and steel but flawed reality. When we saw exactly where that pencil line was drawn, we thought ‘no, they can’t really mean that!’ but they did!

We wrote in numbers to consultations, lobbied MPs and councillors to try and make the government and HS2 see sense. Our protestations were largely ignored by the authorities who seemed to be closing their eyes to their residents’ letters and calls. Maybe they thought that HS2 was going to happen anyway and took the easy way out, despite there being minimal benefit to their own constituents.
There were one or two exceptional people who did see what we were trying to tell them, but they were too few and characterised as NIMBYs.

We asked the right sort of question about the project, even to the extent of one of our members giving expert evidence to a parliamentary committee.

Anyway- it’s gone!

We are all entitled to celebrate having a major worry lifted off our shoulders. But for some people, lasting damage has been done.
There are those who, after fighting for ten years, will never be the same. There are those who have suddenly been forced to sell up house, business and move out.

But yes, some of us will celebrate the cancellation. We are aware, however, that land to have been required for HS2 remains ‘safeguarded’. Until safeguarding is lifted, the land remains under the protection of HS2 and could in theory be used by the project if it restarts in some form. Probably an unlikely outcome, but we want to see safeguarding ended soon.

So, let’s celebrate in our own way and hope we never again hear of HS2!